![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |

The recruitment industry has undergone significant changes over the last 20 years as it has embraced the advancements in technology and adapted to changing behaviours influenced by the ever evolving digital space and the economy.
The essence of recruitment services remains the same though, it’s just the way that we do it, in order to achieve the desired results.
One of the biggest and most rapid changes in recent years has been a mindset change by the client, influenced by the economic downturn to look inwardly at how and where the company can save money or reduce costs.
When you add into the equation the ever increasing number of online tools available to the client, it is easy to understand why such a rapid paradigm shift towards bringing recruitment back in house is taking place.
Currently, the three most popular options available to companies are the ‘Traditional Agency’, the ‘Modern Fixed Fee’ and the “Advertise Only - Online Recruitment” model;.
The Traditional Agency
Recruitment Agencies often specialise in specific industry sectors and operate by providing a shortlist of candidates to an organisation based on the people registered with them. The agency will effectively manage the candidate element of the recruitment process from sign off through to offer. Upon successfully providing a candidate to fill a vacancy, the agency usually receives a percentage of the candidate’s annual salary.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
The Fixed Fee Model
Over the last few years, agencies have started to offer clients a fixed fee solution. Fixed Fee recruitment is a service which is provided to clients for a pre-arranged set cost; thus ensuring that the recruitment process will always remain within a client’s budget. The Fixed Fee method usually allows companies to employ an unlimited number of candidates sourced by the campaign at no extra cost.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
The Advertise Only – Online Recruitment model
Many companies have decided to bring their recruitment back in house, for either all or part of their recruitment needs. The advertise only option is by far the cheapest route to go, if you have the resources in house to manage the response and co-ordinate interviews and offers.
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
The Summary
The essential elements to consider when you are comparing different recruitment options is that of value and whether the solution is the best solution for your vacancy.
Personally, I would split vacancies into the three categories based upon the following criteria. However, for those boarder line cases, you can always consider running with the fixed price or advertise only solution in the first instance.
Use a specialist recruitment agency if:
Opt for a fixed price solution when:
Choose an advertise only service when:
Choosing the right service for each campaign seems both logical and common sense, but the majority of companies still tend to have their preferred route to go down when hiring staff.
Companies should consider that there are many options available to them when hiring staff and the appropriate solution should adopted on an ad hoc basis.
I am always interested to hear what companies and hiring managers think about the ever evolving recruitment industry in general and would welcome anyone that wishes to share their experiences or ask any questions.
| Relevant Links |
| At Last, Something Positive for the Recruitment Owner |
|
Don't Be A Recruitment Lemming
Don't Be A Recruitment Lemming |
| 10 Ways To Halve Your Recruitment Spend |